Lifestyle

Fat Bear Week: Is that bear fat, or just chonky? Lasers may help scientists find out


Cusick was taking a break from work, standing on a platform alongside the Brooks River in Alaska’s Katmai Nationwide Park and Protect — a world-famous spot for bear watching, as the enormous mammals prefer to wade within the water to hang around and catch fish. Otis was just a few hundred ft away, standing comparatively nonetheless.

Cusick, who works for the Nationwide Park Service’s Alaska regional workplace, creates maps and trains individuals on GPS and using scanners within the discipline. He usually makes use of a laser scanner — particularly, a terrestrial lidar scanner — to measure the amount of stationary objects within the park like buildings and gravel piles. It is a $70,000 industrial-grade software that sits on a hefty tripod. That night, Cusick aimed it at Otis, and took a scan.

Lidar is brief for “gentle detecting and ranging” and might be finest identified for its use in autonomous automobiles. A lidar scanner sends out hundreds of thousands of pulses of infrared gentle and measures how lengthy it takes for them to return after hitting an object, similar to Otis. These measurements type some extent cloud that may then be used to construct a three-dimensional map of the thing.

In a matter of seconds, Cusick might see what regarded like pinpoints comprising Otis’s rear on a pill linked to the scanner. Pc software program later processed the scan, making a 3-D mannequin that might be used to find out the width of the bear’s behind.

Cusick was excited; he did not suppose his experiment would work.

“I used to be like, ‘Wow, I obtained a return — I can measure the butt of Otis right here!'” he recalled with a chuckle to CNN Enterprise this week.

A point cloud of a bear that can be used to make a 3-D model.
That lightbulb second for Cusick led to a multi-year effort to make use of a lidar scanner to unobtrusively estimate the volumes (and, by way of that, the weights) of some bears at Katmai as they fatten up for winter, which can assist biologists perceive extra in regards to the animals’ well being (about 2,200 brown bears stay within the park). In 2019 and 2020, bears have been scanned across the time of Fat Bear Week on the park — an annual on-line competitors, at the moment underway by way of Tuesday, the place individuals can vote for the chunkiest (or chonkiest) brown bears as they get able to hibernate for the winter. Although the lidar-assisted try at estimating the bears’ weights was halted this yr because of the pandemic, which made fewer staff out there to assist with the method, Cusick hopes it should proceed sooner or later.

It’d sound less complicated to make use of a scale to weigh bears, but it surely’s impractical within the wild, the place it would get chewed on. (Plus, you’d should lure the bears onto the dimensions and get them to face nonetheless for about 11 seconds or so.) In spring, bears within the wild could also be weighed by biologists who fly in through helicopter, tranquilize the bear, push it right into a web, and carry it through a pulley system. However, along with its intrusiveness, the tactic is probably not attainable in fall, when bears have fattened up for the winter.

“An enormous, large upside of this technique is it is noninvasive; we do not have to seize animals,” mentioned Lindsey Mangipane, an Anchorage-based polar bear biologist for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. “It is quite a bit much less logistically difficult for us as effectively.”

Estimating a bear’s weight with lidar is far much less disruptive, although it is nonetheless very a lot a sophisticated guessing sport. As an example, these taking the scans are solely in a position to seize a part of the bear, as a result of there isn’t any strategy to put a scanner on the opposite facet of the river, Cusick mentioned. To make up for this, they might slice a bear scan in half and double the amount of the extra full facet of the physique to estimate the overall quantity of the bear. And whereas a 3-D scan can be utilized to find out the bear’s quantity (how a lot house it takes up, in three dimensions), it would not infer something about its density, which is required to assist determine how heavy it’s.

Face recognition isn't just for humans — it's learning to identify bears and cows, too

To get guess at density, which can fluctuate from bear to bear relying on gender, bone construction, time of yr, and plenty of different elements, Cusick spoke with biologists who examine the animals. They figured it could be affordable to estimate a bear is made up of 60% water and 40% fats, he mentioned, so he and his colleagues used these percentages in 2019 and 2020 to tease out, from the scanned volumes, estimates of the weights for numerous bears at Katmai.

The general course of requires a number of individuals, Cusick mentioned: one individual performs the scan whereas one other verifies the bear’s identification, for instance. The burden estimates, which for a single bear could also be made with quite a few scans, are additionally made independently by separate individuals and in contrast.

A 3-D model of 747 is shown next to a picture of the bear; 747 was the 2020 winner of Fat Bear Week at Katmai National Park and Preserve, and had the highest estimated weight.

It is at the moment not possible to know the way correct this technique is, however Mangipane is hoping to validate the scanning expertise by partnering with zoos to scan captive polar bears, whose weights are identified since they are often skilled to step on scales. These identified weights might be in contrast with weights derived from 3-D scans of the bears.

Accuracy apart, Cusick mentioned the outcomes have been constant: Final yr, as an example, he and his colleagues used about 10 scans taken over a number of days of a bear often called 747. Two individuals independently estimated 747’s weight from every scan, yielding 20 estimates that averaged 1,416 kilos. Every of the person estimates have been inside about 100 kilos, Cusick mentioned, and the common was an eight-pound distinction from the bear’s heft in 2019.
747 was estimated to be essentially the most voluminous bear last year, in addition to the heaviest. He was additionally voted to the highest of the bracket by Fats Bear Week voters.

Whereas it will likely be not possible to know for certain which bear is actually the fattest this yr, Cusick thinks 747 appears the most important as soon as extra.

“All of us have our favorites,” he mentioned. “The anthropomorphism right here is kind of robust.”



Source link

news7h

News7h: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button