Two individuals who used to work for the family of Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his spouse, Priscilla Chan, have filed a pair of lawsuits in opposition to the billionaire couple and their quite a few family-related company entities.
The circumstances declare that the household corporations are liable for sexual harassment and discrimination by firm staff. Each fits identify Chan and Zuckerberg as defendants, alleging failure to pay wages, amongst different claims.
The plaintiffs are Mia King and an unnamed man known as John Doe. Fb itself just isn’t concerned within the lawsuits.
The lawsuits, which had been filed final month in San Francisco County Superior Courtroom, had been first reported Tuesday by Insider, which has reported on the allegations during the last two years.
Ben LaBolt, a spokesperson for the Chan-Zuckerberg household, stated in an emailed assertion that “separate multi-week investigations into the allegations” resulted in a discovering that “these allegations couldn’t be substantiated.” He stated the household workplace “takes complaints of office misconduct very severely and promptly investigates all such issues.”
“Any criticism made to our HR personnel is taken severely and is investigated and addressed,” he stated. “We’re happy with the group of pros who work within the household workplace and are assured that these claims, which search to unfairly disparage our colleagues, will fail.”
LaBolt declined to answer additional questions.
Courtroom filings describe King as a Black lady and member of the LGBTQ group who labored as a “Safety Operations Assistant.” She labored from Might 2018 by means of February 2019 for Limitless Specialty Providers LLC, which offers safety companies for the Zuckerberg household.
Equally, Doe, an overtly homosexual man, labored because the “Family Operations Supervisor” for the household from January 2017 by means of March 2019.
In her 29-page criticism, King stated she was subjected to quite a few degrading remarks, together with being known as “ghetto,” a “c—” and “b—-,” along with inappropriate remarks about her breasts.
As well as, she alleged that when she introduced up her complaints internally, a feminine colleague instructed her that “males are in management right here, males are in energy,” which King claimed successfully condoned such remarks. She additionally stated she was compelled to work extra time and was not paid appropriately.
Doe stated in his 35-page criticism that he was in control of “overseeing and managing varied properties for the Zuckerberg household.” He alleged that the place resulted in his working greater than 40 hours per week and greater than eight hours per day, “for which he was by no means compensated,” and that quite a few instances he was “pressured to work seventeen-hour days to arrange a property previous to the Zuckerbergs’ arrival” and was not paid extra time.
Doe stated he suffers from epilepsy and was pressured to carry out duties that exacerbated his situation or posed a hazard, akin to climbing ladders or carrying heavy objects. As well as, Doe alleged that he was sexually harassed and subjected to anti-gay slurs.
“Our purchasers stay up for proving their allegations and looking for justice in a court docket of regulation,” stated Colleen Mullen, King and Doe’s legal professional.
Neither Zuckerberg nor any of the opposite named defendants have formally responded in court docket to the allegations within the circumstances. No hearings have been scheduled.