The fifth of the 12 Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous is to admit “to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs” – the reason being that the Being honest with past mistakes and mistakes is at the heart of any recovery process. However, that kind of open admission is largely absent in the work done by the Mohammed bin Nayef Care and Counseling Center, a Saudi Arabian treatment facility established in its name to help with recovery. function. Islamic Terror. Sure enough, no one profiled by Jihad Rehab (Premiering January 22 at Sundance Film Festival) seem interested in actually confessing their jihadist crimes in front of the camera, and that willful omission is a pressing issue throughout Meg Smaker’s documentary, which is undermined by desire want to regularly purchase stories about their subject and, in doing so, have them create their own self-portrait.
After more than 15 years in Guantanamo Bay for multiple terrorism charges as a member of al Qaeda and the Taliban (and as a bodyguard to Osama bin Laden), Yemeni nationals Nadir, Mohammed and Ali were transferred — through a new agreement approved signed between the United States and Saudi Arabia — for the latter Center, where they enroll in a 12-month program designed to transform their hearts and minds. Jihad Rehab provides excerpts from some of the classes the trio (and their teammates) are required to take related to law and marriage, but any larger implications of their guiding philosophy This place, or elemental syllabus, is still vague. The motives, however, were clear: to convince former terrorists that extremism was wrong, that the cause for which they were willing to sacrifice their lives was wrong, and that they should strive to create a peaceful and sustainable future for oneself through achieving a job, a wife and a family.
To put it mildly, the Center sounds a lot like a rehab facility for drug abusers, gamblers, or incarcerated prisoners (or gang members) intending to rehabilitate themselves first. when reintegrated into society. The difference is, before Center, Nadir, Mohammed and Ali were not just in any prison; they are residents of Guantanamo Bay, where they claim to have been tortured and ill-treated, thereby inciting within them a deep anger towards the United States. At least it has not been directly revealed that the trio were wounded at Guantanamo Bay because of their deep hatred of the United States — or, at least, their participation in the war initiated by the al Qaeda brothers, the people feel that way. Such integration is central to Jihad RehabThe desire to evoke sympathy for these terrorists is represented by an early cartoon depicting Ali being pushed out of a window as a child (symbolically a terrorist) and landed directly in a cell at Guantanamo Bay, where horror followed — an image of him being a passive victim of both jihadists and Americans, and directly ignoring all the evil he committed in the name of al Qaeda.
None of the three men introduced in Jihad Rehab discuss their actual time as jihadists, and the fourth individual – Abu Ghanim, who was detained by the US government as a security henchman of Osama bin Laden, joined al Qaeda and Taliban, with knowledge of chemical weapons, international missile smuggling, and involvement in the USS Cole bombing — repeatedly refused to answer Smaker’s questions about his past before cutting completely cut ties with production. To her credit, the director sometimes presses Ghanim and others about their acts of terror. When it’s empty, however, she goes back to detailing their horror stories of their Guantanamo Bay stay, as well as letting them talk about the dire state of their current situation, all even as the sad orchestra plays on the soundtrack and the unfortunate slow-motion shots of Pigeons by the Sea (which aim to evoke the freedom these men seek) try to hold the heart of a person.
The center claims that 85% of those who pass through its doors are successfully rehabilitated, and that number sounds as credible as Nadir, Mohammed, and Ali, who say they want to lead normal lives with no surprises. is a prisoner of Guantanamo Bay. , but it is clear that never expressing a new cultural or political ideology would suggest they have changed in any fundamental way. In one narrated scene, Mohammed makes it clear that Smaker couldn’t film his new wife because of bad photography of women, and in a panic after driving to a drug store, he informed the director. acting that she should stop. pester him with questions and get married and have kids instead. The portrait by Jihad Rehab not of individuals determined to turn over a new leaf on any psychological or emotional level, but of beaten criminals who are displeased that their murderous actions have caused severe consequences that continued for many years after the conclusion of their battlefield tour.
“The center claims that 85% of those who pass through its doors are successfully rehabilitated, and that number sounds as credible as Nadir, Mohammed, and Ali, who say they want to lead normal lives with no surprises. is a prisoner of Guantanamo Bay. …”
Ali’s story is that he only attended al Qaeda’s Al Farouq training camp because he was instructed to do so by his brother Qasim al-Raymi, the late founder and leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. this at the age of 16. The fact that Ali blames his brother for ruining his life seems accurate. What he doesn’t do, however, is accept any responsibility for his own fate — a scenario repeated over and over in Jihad Rehab, which consumes objects of any organ. The only things that Nadir, Mohammed, and Ali felt comfortable recounting were things that happened to them, and as a result, they became not only unreliable narrators of their own stories but are also inconclusive examples of the resilience of Islamic extremists of this kind .
In its final passages, Jihad Rehab conveys how Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s rise to power in Saudi Arabia — as well as his definition and harsher approach to handling terrorism — throws these men’s remaining prospects into the streets. straight and narrow into anarchy. The new challenges posed by this situation (no job or money; cut off loved ones, unable to find a spouse) certainly make it harder to fight back against al Qaeda and ISIS . Even at this late stage, however, Smaker’s documentary focuses on extrinsic hardships as catalysts for terrorism, rather than investigating the nagging idea that recovery can only achieved through a fundamentally altered worldview.