News

Meadows contempt vote shows growing power of committee Jan. 6


Tuesday’s move against the former White House chief of staff is the latest attempt to infiltrate the inner circle of a former president who has seen the US Capitol come under attack by an agitated mob. by his plot to overturn a fair election. But it also shows how the House Select Committee investigating the attack is now taking on a much more important role than simply documenting a day that will live in infamy. It has become a key protagonist in the battle to save American democracy on the eve of the presidential election, in which Trump could attempt to regain power, through nefarious means if necessary.

A disdainful introduction to the Department of Justice, following an earlier similar quote against Trump former politician Steve Bannon, Reflecting the growing motivation for the commission, the committee called over 300 witnesses to provide testimony and evidence. The investigation clearly has hidden depths. ONE series of messages to Meadows released by the panel, documenting panicked lawmakers, Fox News lawmakers and other members of the media, and even Trump’s stepson pleads with him to stop the uprising, hinting at a pile of evidence gathered but not yet made public. This article not only clearly depicts Trump’s lack of obligation to protect lawmakers and the Constitution, it also shows that those around the former President know the damage he is causing in real time. – although then tried vindicate the truth.

By exposing such duplication, the committee is also building a picture of the cowardice, dishonesty, and for-profit that propaganda media figures and Republican lawmakers have bought into. Trump’s cult of personality, which led to the President being impeached twice in numerous attacks on the Constitution while he was in office. The same “Make America Great Again” industrial complex that is currently assisting Trump in his preparations for a new presidential run could threaten America’s political tradition even more severely in 2024.

The committee is in a race against time, as Republicans will shut down if they win the House back in 2022. And it’s not yet clear if voters will be shaken when they learn the full terrible truth of what. happened on January 6th when they voted in the midterm elections or not. next year and for three more years for the presidency.

Many other problems, including soaring inflation and an unending pandemic that really bothers Americans. Recently cassation election in Virginia, in which Republicans dominate by focusing on education and the economy, cite a waning fear of Trump as a driving factor at the ballot box. And democracy is often not a tangible commodity: The history of autocracy on the rise abroad shows that it often goes unnoticed until it’s gone. The proposals, meanwhile, that the committee could even indict Trump on criminal charges, stem in part from remarks by the Republican Vice Chairman. Liz Cheney This week, it still looks to be at the boldest end of the panel’s possible picks.
& # 39;  Need to end this call & # 39 ;: Jan 6 committee reveals new text message to Meadows upstairs

But as it builds a picture of what happened 11 months ago, the committee of seven Democrats and two Republicans, who broke the cult of the former President, is also revealing. personality of the world Trump. In that sense, the exploration of a historic event is becoming perhaps the most important forward-looking weapon in the growing struggle to preserve democracy from the threat the former President still poses. out.

Cheney, one of the few House Republicans to tell the truth about Trump’s crimes against the Constitution, said ahead of the vote to refer Meadows to the Justice Department for possible criminal actions. out.

‘He is destroying his legacy’

With the exception of Cheney and fellow GOP committee member Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, the House of Representatives largely voted on the party line to consider Meadows not in favor of providing testimony to the committee after providing thousands of pages of evidence. including email and text exchange.

Some of those messages suggest that he was inundated with calls from some of Trump’s closest allies asking the then President to intervene in the uprising. But Trump refused to do so for 187 minutes.

In an exchange, the former President’s son, Donald Trump Jr., told Meadows as violence broke out that his father needed to “condemn this as soon as possible,” according to Cheney on Monday.

In another message Cheney read, Fox News host Laura Ingraham, who later misled viewers about the true nature of the uprising, wrote: “Mark, the President needs to tell everyone in the Capitol go home. This is hurting all of us. He is destroying his legacy.”

Liz Cheney's latest move against Trump highlights her distinct path among Republicans

In terms of it, Meadows was in a much stronger position than Bannon, who was not serving as a White House official at the time of the uprising, to avoid testifying before the committee by asserting executive privilege, tradition that presidents expect. on privacy in consultations with key aides. And there is no official closer to the president than the chief of staff.

But the committee argued that while it wanted extensive testimony from Meadows, some of its requests were clearly not within executive privilege, especially since Meadows had turned over many of the documents they wanted to ask him. . And the panel said the question of executive privilege did not arise uniformly because it wanted to talk to Meadows about circumstances that don’t always involve Trump — such as any interactions that Trump might have had. he has had with Republican officials in Georgia who have been pressuring Trump to topple Biden’s election victory in a critical swing.

In a new revelation on Tuesday, California Representative Zoe Lofgren revealed a text sent from an unnamed election official from Peach State to Meadows as Trump leaned on Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. “This call needs to be ended,” the official said, according to Lofgren.

Republicans have opposed, however, Trump’s prerogative to assert executive privilege As a former president has yet to be fully examined in the Supreme Court and the commission, it has, therefore, exceeded its limits with contempt of Congress.

But that argument from Trump’s allies is undermined by the fact that Meadows appears to refuse to discuss the events he described in his new book. One committee member, Rep. Adam Schiff, argued that if Congress could not enforce the subpoena against Meadows, the possibility of future scrutiny of an over-infringing executive branch would be null disable.

The Dirty Little Secret That Mark Meadows Texts Reveal

“Nobody is above the law,” said the California Democrat.

Some of Trump’s allies in the House, including some suspected of having ties to him on January 6, have turned the tables to argue that the abuse of power was indeed the work of those investigating the investigation. implemented insurgency – a strategy to turn the tide. perfection of the former President.

Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, for example, described the job of the White House Chief of Staff as “the closest person” to his relationship with the president and said it was “in the public interest” to be in the public interest. Meadows’ dealings with Trump. is kept secret. However, the then chief of staff did not consult with Trump about a major national security crisis or a national disaster. He was on the scene when one of the worst attacks on America’s political freedoms in generations – arguably a far greater threat to the public interest than a breach of intelligence. presidential secrecy.

‘He calls his own book fake news’

Another member of the committee, Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, accused Meadows of only changing his mind to cooperate with the committee after being angered by Trump over the memoir released earlier this month.

“He calls his own book fake news, which is a pretty devastating review to show on your own book,” Raskin said during a floor debate on Tuesday.

Meadows, a former congressman from North Carolina who, despite his staunch conservatism sometimes works across the aisle, is Trump’s latest to explore the options and consequences inherent in participating. orbit of the former President.

Many members of the Trump circle have been forced to decide between appeasing and abetting their boss’s unruly behavior, which undermines the constitution and their own reputations. Some, like Meadows, have therefore faced the threat of criminal action. Other places, such as old New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, have smeared their own considerable political legacies by embracing Trump’s anti-democratic crusade. Several former campaign officials convicted in the Mueller investigation have served time in prison for having ties to a boss who checked the rule of law.
Fact check: Several newspapers incorrectly reported key details of the Meadows story about Trump and the protesters
The hypocrisy of Fox News characters, who privately begged Meadows to end the uprising but were unwilling to argue a similar sentence with their viewers, shows that they don’t like to waste their energy. strong ratings and prominence with the former President’s loyal base. Top officials like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who once said Trump was responsible for the Capitol riots but later backed down, knew his future chances in power depended his patronage. McCarthy’s mandate to be speaker if Republicans win the House in 2022 has been questioned when Trump’s allies warn of his compliance for the former President is not enthusiastic enough, despite his extensive efforts to secure retribution for the coup plot.

With this in mind, the committee not only uncovered Trump’s transgressions in a historic purge against fundamental American political values, but also evidence of his enduring power within the Communist Party. peace and among supporters of his conservative, propaganda media. It highlights the fact that far from ending on January 6th, the threat to the democracy that Trump represents will build on the day.

Voters may decide that all of this is not enough to disqualify the former President from another view at the White House. But they wouldn’t be able to say they weren’t warned.

.



Source link

news7h

News7h: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button