Auto Express

NYT dives into Elon Musk’s drive to promote self-driving Teslas

We’ve known for a while that Elon Musk have a problem with use radar sensors on Teslas. We also already know that the car manufacturer is under federal investigation for Autopilot-related incidents and U.S. senators and others have criticized the use of the terms Autopilot and Full Self-Driving deceptive and dangerous. But New York Times posted an article today, “Inside Tesla as Elon Musk promotes a bleak vision for self-driving cars” It’s true to what the headline says: The Times interviewed 19 people involved in the development of Autopilot over the years, who described Musk’s internal orders, disagreements from engineers over the project judgments and statements by the CEO that they say have misled the public.

The heart of the inner story Tesla’s Find a self-driving car Here’s an insight into Musk’s reasoning. The Times wrote:

“For several years, Autopilot incorporated radar, and for a time Tesla worked on developing its own radar technology. But three people working on this project said Musk has repeatedly told members of the Autopilot team that humans can only drive with two eyes, and this means cars can only be driven by cameras.

Musk insists a Tesla must be able to drive on-site without assistance, using only the camera. Eight of the Tesla engineers interviewed by the NYT disagreed with this direction of the technology, as did outside experts; some left the company, while others followed Musk’s marching orders. But for this reason, along with cost, Musk’s views on the aesthetics of in-vehicle radar transmitters, and his preference not to use third-party vendors, he’s pushed for camera-only technology. and in May declared that Tesla dropped the radar.

However, the NYT quotes computer vision expert Schuyler Cullen, who oversees autonomous driving research at Samsung, as saying that the camera-only approach is fundamentally flawed: “The camera is not the eye. ! Pixels are not retinal ganglia! The FSD computer is no different from the visual cortex! ”

Engineers on the project also objected to the marketing team’s plan to name the driver-assistance technology Autopilot, for the same reasons that critics and Tesla regulators have cited – that implies capabilities that this technology doesn’t have. Their preferred alternative name is Copilot.

The article also describes making this video is still on Tesla’s website, the aim is to show how well Autopilot 2.0 can drive itself. In fact, the route was mapped out ahead of time using three-dimensional software not included in the consumer version of Autopilot – and the vehicle crashed into a roadside fence during filming.

The NYT compiled a series of Musk’s claims over the years that autonomous driving was just around the corner, when it clearly was, and in fact it wasn’t, and said engineers believe Musk promises possibilities that aren’t. can be performed. They were “surprised and worried” when Musk in early 2016 promised that all subsequent Teslas built would have the components for “full self-driving”. Less than a month after the fatal crash involving Autopilot in May 2016, Musk announced that autonomous driving was “basically a problem solved” and Teslas were able to drive safely. than humans.

The article ends with this quote from Amnon Shashua, chief executive officer of Mobileye, a former Tesla supplier, who advised, “One should not get caught up in what Tesla says. Truth is not necessarily their end goal. The ultimate goal is to build a business.”

Go New York Times give full article.

Related videos:

Source link


News7h: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button