‘Squad’ member pushing for Medicare to cover wigs, but critics warn it’s a slippery slope
Get the newest BPR information delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
“Squad” member Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts is coping with pushback over her efforts to lobby for Medicare to produce safety for hair loss.
Launched on Thursday by every Pressley and Massachusetts Rep. James P. McGovern, the Wigs as Sturdy Medical Gear Act is designed “to help individuals affected by Alopecia Areata and victims with most cancers who’re current course of chemotherapy.”
Alopecia areata “is an autoimmune sickness that has every a genetic predisposition and environmental triggers,” primarily based on Lynne Goldberg, the director of the Hair Clinic at Boston Medical Center.
Goldberg spoke with The Brink, a publication of Boston Faculty, ultimate yr following Pressley’s bombshell announcement that she suffers from this case:
She admitted inside the video that the hair atop her head was a wig and that she was lastly “ready” to reveal her true self.
A yr and a half later, she now seeks to empower totally different victims with the equivalent alternative of being able to placed on a wig until they’re ready.
“[T]o be bald as a lady truly does disrupt customary and societal norms of what’s acceptable, what’s expert, what’s participating, what’s feminine. It’s lots higher than magnificence…. It takes an precise toll,” she acknowledged in an interview this week with Vanity Fair.
“It’s a simple legislative restore, and I really feel it’ll have a profound affect,” she added.
Whereas that’s little doubt true, critics say it doesn’t justify using taxpayer money to subsidize wigs so that others would possibly actually really feel larger about themselves.
The criticism fits along with the broadly held notion that elective procedures — boob jobs, liposuction, tummy tucks, facelifts, butt lifts, “The Ivanka,” and plenty of others. — aren’t medically important procedures.
Critics moreover discover the scarcity of safety for lots further useful elective companies paying homage to listening to aids, which neither Medicare parts A nor B reportedly cowl.
Closing nevertheless not least, critics moreover degree out that a great deal of organizations all by the states distribute wigs completely free.
Within the occasion that they cowl “magnificence” for one issue, then they need to cowl magnificence for each half! Hair elimination, face lifts, boob jobs, manicures, pedicures, make-up…rattling, let’s do it!!!
😂😂😂😂— Joanna (@jmc69077) October 2, 2021
So would tit jobs.. and lipo…and braces…and laser hair elimination…
No remind me why I should pay for any of that if I can’t play with any of that.
— DKL/PTY (@PTYKPR) October 1, 2021
Easy to spend money you’ve pilfered from one other particular person
— Dave Engelman (@Krazy_Boy_Fredo) October 1, 2021
Priority should be dental, imaginative and prescient, and listening to aides. American Most cancers Society already covers wigs.
— Angela Elliott (@angie_k_elliott) October 2, 2021
1. American Most cancers Society give free wigs.
2. Pantene Pretty Lengths offers free wigs.
3. Hair We Share Lengths offers free wigs.
4. Ebeauty offers free wigs.
— Tired of being politically acceptable (@USBornNRaised) October 1, 2021
Correct. I’d need it to cowl dental and imaginative and prescient.
— Pam S (@pbsmith70) October 1, 2021
Must cowl listening to aids. THAT would have a profound affect.
— Sarah (@SarahDi1010) October 2, 2021
That’s ridiculous. Not having a wig gained’t kill you.
— Brooklyn (@Brklynguy347) October 1, 2021
There are a selection of charities that current wigs for people with illnesses. We don’t need the federal authorities becoming concerned. We’ve donated hair quite a lot of events to these areas, and I do know quite a lot of totally different people who’ve as properly.
— Unperson – American Pitbull 🇺🇸 (@MelissaRNMBA) October 1, 2021
A press launch printed alongside the bill Thursday tried to preempt this criticism by claiming “[m]any personal insurance coverage coverage cowl wigs for these current course of treatments that set off hair loss or who’re affected by alopecia areata.”
Whereas that may very well be the case, Medicare isn’t personal insurance coverage protection …
The press launch moreover contained an announcement from the congresswoman.
“Since I first revealed my alopecia evaluation, I’ve been intentional about creating space and creating neighborhood for these of us who’ve medical circumstances that affect our hair – and this bill is a continuation of those efforts. Every explicit particular person residing with Alopecia, battling most cancers, or coping with one different medical scenario that ends in hair loss, should be succesful to entry wigs and totally different head coverings,” she acknowledged.
“Our bill is responsive and sends a robust message to these communities: we see you, you belong, and likewise you have to be dealt with with dignity and respect. I’m grateful to my buddy Congressman McGovern for his partnership on this deeply non-public and necessary legal guidelines,” she added.
Completely different critics within the meantime have accused the congresswoman of corruption, though, in fairness to her, they’ve offered no proof to substantiate this concept.
?? How corrupt can points get?
— pagebike (@pagepaul10) October 2, 2021
Let’s restore the title we may: Communist requires further authorities spending of working class tax money on herself…
— ASIS CCP CIA Interpol ❤️👨❤️💋👨 A-Hole Commies (@HappyPwnage4U) October 1, 2021
That’s on no account in regards to the issue they pretend it’s to be about.
Some bureaucrat will get a Capex of quite a lot of million {{dollars}} that they’ll use to buy wigs and get kickbacks from the wigs.
Moreover they create an office to deal with wig logistics and create jobs for his or her family&associates— w1llc4st3r (@w1ll_c4st3r) October 1, 2021
The one excellent news for the critics is that the bill most likely stands little or no likelihood of making it into regulation.
It’d should make it by means of a House presently centered on totally different points and a Senate whose Republican chief has the perfect set of hair on this facet of the Mississippi and thus most likely isn’t too concerned about alopecia.
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/10/02/squad-member-pushing-for-medicare-to-cover-wigs-but-critics-warn-its-a-slippery-slope-1143303/ | ‘Squad’ member pushing for Medicare to cowl wigs, nevertheless critics warn it’s a slippery slope