After most Remarkable and turbulent day In modern Swedish political history, Magdalena Andersson – prime minister just seven hours on Wednesday before resigning – can agree one thing with her opponents: the country’s politics are a mess.
Within a day, all the stresses that have increased over the past decade as a result of speed up Nationalist Swedish Democrats broke out, highlighting the difficulties in forming a stable government in the fragmented Scandinavian political system.
First, at 10 a.m., Andersson, leader of the centre-left Social Democrats, was confirmed as prime minister despite losing the vote on her appointment due to the opposition’s inability to rally. majority to prevent her from taking office.
By 4pm, she was in deep trouble when her own spending plan – drawn up when she was finance minister in the previous union – was rejected. Instead, a budget drafted by the opposition, the anti-immigration Swedish Democrats and two mainstream centre-right parties was passed. It is the first time that a budget drafted by a party known as the far-right in Swedish politics has been approved.
An hour and a half later, Andersson’s government collapsed when the junior party, the Greens, abandoned the coalition, forcing the prime minister to resign.
“Many people are wondering what the hell is going on in Swedish politics right now,” said Ebba Busch, leader of the centre-right Christian Democrats. Ulf Kristersson, the leader of her ally of the moderates and possible future prime minister, added: “This political circus is bad for Sweden.”
In all the chaos, Andersson chance to redeem. The same parties backing her as prime minister said on Wednesday that they still support her. This means she is likely to be re-confirmed in the coming days as prime minister, leading the one-party minority government.
Andreas Norlen, speaker of parliament, said he would nominate Andersson as prime minister again on Monday, but in a fit of anger on Thursday criticized the Greens, saying he was “deeply regretful”. about the events of the previous day.
Some political experts believe the upheaval could strengthen her position within her party. “An independent Social Democratic government could better emerge from this turmoil,” said Jenny Madestam, a senior lecturer in politics at Sodertorn University.
All parties are now looking ahead to national elections next September, which analysts say was the reason for Wednesday’s chaos as some groups wanted to raise their profile. But it is far from certain that new elections will solve Sweden’s fundamental problem: a fragmented political system in which forming a stable government has become one. Fight.
“The big problem is the state of the parliament, the weakness that we have seen over the past 10 years. As far as most people can tell it will be after the next election. Andreas Wallstrom, head of forecasting at the Swedish lender, said it would be difficult to come up with key policy measures.
Swedish businesses have been frustrated by the government’s inability to address energy, infrastructure, housing and immigration problems. “As far as I can see, this government has achieved very little on policy over the past seven years,” a senior executive said this month.
Political winds seem to favor the opposing right, and especially nationalists. “The biggest victory for the Swedish Democratic Party since its founding is a fact,” said Mathias Karlsson, the party’s chief think-tank, posting a photo of himself and the party leader drinking champagne yesterday.
Not only has their budget been passed, but their main problems – increased gang crime include shooting and bombing, as well as immigration – are voters’ priorities. NS Swedish Democratic Party also seem close to their goal of creating a conservative bloc with the moderate Party and the Christian Democrats.
“The winners from Wednesday are the Swedish Democrats. The right has a clear alternative government. Madestam said all issues are being worked out.
Andersson had difficulty assembling a viable government coalition. Her supporting parties ranged from the ex-communist Left to the nominally Right-wing Center as well as the Greens. The latter two sides went into re-examination of each other in the chaos on Wednesday, while the Center refused to allow the Left any influence.
Stefan Lofven, Andersson’s predecessor and caretaker chancellor, managed paper about the difference for seven years, but before the Central election, the Left and the Greens both wanted to bolster their support.
However, Madestam argues that the largest parties – the Social Democrats, the Moderate Party and the Swedish Democratic Party – benefit the most. “Voters are seeing what happens when we have an ambiguous situation. They will think twice when choosing their party in the next election and think how can Sweden have a stable government,” she added.
Until then, Andersson has a very good chance of starting over as prime minister but is less likely to enact major reforms.
Wallstrom said he and many economists are frustrated by the lack of investment despite growing integration problems and crime. Sweden’s public finances are strong, with debt-to-GDP levels returning to pre-pandemic levels of around 35%.
“We see the political cost of weak economic policies over the past few years,” he added. Extremist parties [the Left and Sweden Democrats] getting votes. The ways to stop those extremes of power are to improve the economic situation for many, and we can afford to both cut taxes and increase welfare spending.”