News

The Pentagon Leaker Is a Public Service Hero

Pentagon documents leaked revealed extensive US espionage against US allies. They also include some important revelations about the war in Ukraine, from the presence of a small US force on the ground to Ukrainian President Zelenskyintention to use long-range missiles to strike targets inside Russia.

Authorities arrested one suspect—Jack Teixeira, a 21-year-old National Guard pilot. At the moment, his motive for leaking documents remains unclear. The Discord group where he is said to have posted the documents was originally intended for gun enthusiasts. this and some other complaints floating around in early reports might suggest that Teixeira holds right-wing beliefs. On the other hand, the The New York Times report that, whatever his motives, “indignation about misconduct or government policy is unlikely to be a factor.”

Personally, I don’t care what his motives are or whether his ideological beliefs are the same as mine. If he is “guilty” of leak these documentsPilot Teixeira is performing public service.

Citizens in a democracy can make informed decisions about their country’s foreign policy—and that principle is more important than ever in the face of potentially catastrophic conflict between the United States and the United States. Ky and Russia.

The Washington Post respond to the increase of Donald Trump by adopting the noble slogan “Democracy dies in the dark.” The tagline appears at the top of their website and online shop sells “Democracies Dies in Darkness” shirts in various shapes and sizes. Then you might think that parcel would be delighted to see important information on war and peace issues come to light so that they can become the subject of democratic discussion and debate. Instead, their Editorial Board is consufused about the “harmful” nature of the leak and the possibility of the information “falling into the wrong hands.”

The implication could be that the lives of intelligence sources would be in jeopardy due to the leak. It’s a standard statement made by the Pentagon and national security officials following previous major leaks of Chelsea Manning And Edward Snowden. I don’t know how to rule out this possibility maybe happen at some point in the future. But common sense will tell us that if and when there is a real case of even one death anywhere in the world that is linked to leaked information, we will know about it.

The parcel did not specify whether the hand of the American public was among that information should falls in, but the implied answer is ‘no’. “Confidentiality is essential to a functioning government,” wrote the editorial board, and “[b]Breaking the law for a spiritual amusement is a despicable betrayal of trust and oath.

It’s also important information from the perspective of Americans, who should have a say in how deeply our country should be engaged in that war.

The Editors’ statement that Teixeira’s sole motive was to undertake a “psychic trip” may be hasty. It’s also completely unrelated. The question is whether that is a bad thing for the rest of us to know what we know now.

For example, we now know that Zelensky wanted to use the long-range missiles he had long requested to hit targets inside Russia itself. That is understandable from his point of view. He is fighting against an invading army and he wants to attack the invader in whatever way causes the most damage.

But it’s also important information from the perspective of Americans, who should have a say in how deeply our country should be engaged in that war. In the past, Biden has repeatedly drawn lines in the sand about what kind of military aid would be too escalatory — and then cross the lines as pressure continues to be applied by the hawk.

There is little pressure to be more cautious and restrained. And call for de-escalation and peace negotiations, while rather popular Global, has been sent to the outermost fringes of American political discourse. Anyone worried about an escalating spiral and thinking that even a messy and unsatisfactory negotiated solution would be better than a never-ending war. blur as a “Putin apologist”. Less surprisingly, in such an environment, US involvement continues to escalate beyond previously impregnable boundaries.

For now, at least, if Biden starts to hesitate about longer-range missiles, the American public will know that they will be used to strike inside Russia. This would obviously not only escalate tensions between Washington and Moscow, but could also bring Beijing into the fray. So far, China has limited arming its ally (Russia) in the same way that the US has armed Ukraine, but that could change—and the Chinese leadership has pointed out that the offensive in Russian territory is one of their red lines.

An undated photo shows Jack Douglas Teixeira, a 21-year-old member of the United States Air Force National Guard who has been arrested by the FBI, for his alleged involvement in the online leak of documents. secret documents, take a selfie at an unknown location.

Social media site/via Reuters

Perhaps you believe the risks are worth it to defeat a dangerous and belligerent Russia. Strong. But it would be great if we could at least have a public debate about it with all the facts available. Likewise, you might not think that having “special operations personnel” from the United States and several other NATO countries operating is not a big deal. On the ground in Ukraine. The number of NATO boots – and especially the number of American boots – on the ground is very small. And American soldiers shooting or being shot by Russian soldiers will not must direct conflict between the two nuclear powers. So maybe it’s worth rolling the dice.

But is it worth it, if America is a democracy, don’t American citizens have a say in this matter? in one The New York Times op-ed Last May, President Biden promised the public, “As long as the United States or our allies are not attacked, we will not be directly involved in this conflict, by sending troops American team to fight in Ukraine or attack Russian forces.”

It would be one thing if he announced publicly that he had changed his mind, asked Congress for permission, and led a head-scratching public debate about whether the cause of doing everything possible to Ensuring an American ally’s victory in Ukraine is worth it with the significantly increased risk of a regional conflict turning into a world war between two or more nuclear-armed powers. But he didn’t do any of that. He just sent special forces personnel and hoped that the public wouldn’t find out that he broke his promise.

Judging by their eagerness to pursue every clue about the leaker’s identity and their tick lack interested in leaked content—obviously Washington Post and much of the rest of the mainstream media think that any sublime principles they may subscribe to about democracy and darkness end up at the water’s edge. But decisions about war and peace are some of the most important any government can make—even if war doesn’t involve potential conflict between nuclear powers. . If democratic principles matter anywhere, they matter here too.

In Russia, foreign policy decisions are made by Vladimir Putin and other senior officials and everyone else follows orders. In the United States, things are supposed to be different.

If you believe in democracy, the question you should ask for an answer is Are not, “How did a 21-year-old National Guard get access to this information?” That is, “Why is it kept private from the rest of us?”



Source by [author_name]

news7h

News7h: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button
Immediate Peak