Bluesky has a lot of researchers – here’s why
Social media platform blue sky relatively new, but it has been exponential growth EQUAL other platform experience an X-odus. According to measure altitudeBluesky may have favored a particular community: researchers.
Also: If you switch to a domain name on Bluesky, you MUST do this immediately
On Tuesday, the data company that tracks how published work is shared, shared on Bluesky Research mentions on the platform have now surpassed 500,000. Last week, Altmetric posted that they have been monitoring the platform since late October and noticed that attention to academic articles on Bluesky is higher than on similar sites.
“The academic community and the general public have clearly embraced Bluesky as one of the core places for disseminating and discussing new research,” the company said.
As of December 3, Almetric found “395,000 posts on Bluesky that link to a research article or other research object with an academic identifier such as DOI, PubMed ID, URN, etc.” topic explained. “This is extremely high for a platform that has only been open since February for general registrations.”
Also: 8 Bluesky tips every new user should know
The fact that research mentions increased by more than 100,000 in just one week is promising for the growing #Academicsky community.
By contrast, Altmetric points out that the #AcademicTwitter audience on X today posted research only 18,000 times in June 2011, when the platform was 6 years old and had 100 million users. In that sense, Bluesky’s growth rate among academics seems to be exponentially higher.
Altmetric found that Twitter (then known as X) didn’t reach more than 300,000 posts about the study until January 2014, three years later.
“Bluesky has become a popular social media channel for media professionals and scholars,” said Amye Kenall, vice president of product, data and analytics at parent company Altmetric Digital Science. research information”. in topic.
Also: How to move from X to Bluesky without losing followers
“In our own research, we found more than 22% of researchers are using Bluesky instead of any other social media channel.”
Altmetric has several theories about how this trend happened. For one, microblogging is no longer new or unfamiliar to Internet users, mainly thanks to legacy sites like X. Because of that familiarity, groups like #AcademicTwitter have had to migrate and reconnect on Bluesky instead of forming naturally from scratch over time.
In addition, Bluesky also has an optimal format. Altitudes are noted in Other posts that X de-prioritized posts with links — one user called these posts “regulated” — because of corporate advertising models. This approach can hinder researchers from trying to share their work.
Also: How to use the Bluesky starter pack to find greener social media pastures
Finally, Altmetric credit Bluesky’s “Open Platform” allows users and their data to enter or exit their services freely, customizing everything from algorithms related to block lists and censorship. ” However, while Bluesky no training artificial intelligence (AI) with user posts and data (not like X), that openness also does not protect your data from public data collection.
How to get traction on Bluesky
For scientists, researchers, and academics curious about how to optimize the sharing of their work, Altmetric explains that it uses the same scoring metrics for Bluesky as it does for X. “Post Originals are 1 point, reposts are 0.85, and while we record all posts, we achieve the score after 200 retweets of the original post,” the company said in the thread.
Altmetric notes that it cannot track research shared through short links. However, the company is working with Bluesky to fix this issue. It also advises researchers against adding a link to a post and then deleting it after it has been automatically embedded, as this process cuts off Altmetric’s ability to track results.
